![]() ![]() ![]() * pushes for additional content or services (templates, writing courses etc.) * rather expensive, with very little features (aside from the online and live collaboration) above cheaper alternatives (and, as mentioned, even lacking features) * from what I have observed, paid upgrades with high frequency with little feature improvements * activation code and email registration even for the trial * Installer on the Mac (normally, apps are downloaded in a container and are just copied, even if they have involved online functions for cloud sharing and collaboration) There are other things that rub me the wrong way and are indications that Final Draft is desparately trying to protect its market share and clings to traditional technology instead of innovating, such as: in the edit version that you do not need to care about while writing.) Slugline and Highland 2 differentiate between an edit and a submission version, which means that they can skip page breaks, page headings, CONT'd etc. (Fade In does, too, and one of the reasons is that both of them are stuck in a single WYSIWYG file paradigm. (These two are Mac only, but there are similar programs and cloud services for Win and Linux out there.)įinal Draft doesn't do that, and still feels a lot more like a traditional word processor than a dedicated screenwriting tool. You just type, and the program takes care of indenting and capitalization of character names, dialog, parenthetical, transitions etc. To hack down lots of dialog, with a bit of action in between, Slugline or Highland 2, to name just two examples, are infinitely more pleasant. It does not auto format (or at least it doesn't with the standard settings right after install, and I could not find a button to turn it on.) I downloaded the trial, and it's not a nice writing experience (for screenplays). but I can tell you why people would not want to use Final Draft for everything. Just for the standards question: Both Scrivener and Fade In can im-/export a Final Draft file.Ĭlick to expand.The collaboration thing may be. That may not mean that it is good or bad software, just that it's that way for me.) (Just to mention it, Final Draft rubbed me exactly the wrong way, in particular how its features and prices changed over time. Let me just say that their web presence rubbed me just the right way, very similar to the way Scrivener and Literature & Latte rubbed me way back when. Now, there's not much rational reasoning (beside that their price point and price/feature development over time seemed reasonable) behind my choice. ), and I quickly settled on Fade In Pro, if I were to employ something like that. Admittedly, I did not check everything on your list (some of them I didn't even know existed, as they didn't show up in searches or lists. If you don't, well, it's not that expensive and is a writer's Swiss Army App of Writing anyway.Ģ) I looked around for screenplay writing apps some time ago. If you have it anyway, it's a good place to start. It has templates and functions for screenplay formatting. So take everything I say with a big grain of salt.ġ) If you have Scrivener, try that first. I don't write screenplays (yet?), though I have toyed with the idea. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |